Peran Mediasi Motivasi Berprestasi dalam Hubungan Pengalaman Penugasan dan Keberanian Mengambil Risiko Terhadap Penalaran Moral Perwira TNI Angkatan Laut

Authors

  • Wiwin Dwi Handayani Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Lutfi Arya Universitas Hang Tuah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jip.10.1.49-66.2026

Keywords:

moral reasoning, achievement motivation, risk-taking, navy officers, assignment experiences

Abstract

This study examined the relationships among assignment experience, risk-taking propensity, achievement motivation, and moral reasoning in Indonesian Navy officers. This topic is important because professional experience alone does not guarantee ethical maturity in hierarchical organizations. The study aimed to test whether assignment experience and risk-taking affected moral reasoning directly, or indirectly through achievement motivation. A quantitative survey was conducted with 398 officers aged 35–42 years. Moral reasoning was measured using the Defining Issues Test (DIT), while achievement motivation and risk-taking were measured using adapted Likert scales. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Descriptive results showed that the largest proportion of officers were at Stage 5 social contract orientation (22.9%), and 9.5% reached Stage 6 universal ethical principles. Structural analysis showed that assignment experience significantly predicted achievement motivation (p < .001; C.R. = 7.758), and risk-taking also significantly predicted achievement motivation (p = .002; C.R. = 3.109). However, neither variable directly predicted moral reasoning (p = .062 and p = .784, respectively). Achievement motivation had a significant positive effect on moral reasoning (p = .004; C.R. = 2.851) and fully mediated the relationships between the independent variables and moral reasoning. The model demonstrated good fit indices (Chi-square/df = 1.829; GFI = .942; CFI = .952; RMSEA = .046). These findings suggest that ethical development in military settings depends more on value-based achievement motivation than on experience alone. This highlights the need for leadership training that combines performance orientation with ethical reflection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aquino, K., & Reed, A., II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423

Bucata, G., & Andrei, A. (2024). Leadership and management changes in military organizations and their impact on professional performance. Land Forces Academy Review, 29(1), 45–58.

Fischer, K. W., Yan, Z., & Stewart, J. (2012). Adult cognitive development: Dynamics in the developmental web. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 491–516). Oxford University Press.

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814

Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2011). Moral identity: What is it, how does it develop, and is it linked to moral action? Child Development Perspectives, 5(3), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00189.x

Henschke, A., & Sedmak, C. (2025). Ethical decision-making in contemporary military operations. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 28(2), 311–329.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-21

How to Cite

Wiwin Dwi Handayani, & Lutfi Arya. (2026). Peran Mediasi Motivasi Berprestasi dalam Hubungan Pengalaman Penugasan dan Keberanian Mengambil Risiko Terhadap Penalaran Moral Perwira TNI Angkatan Laut. Jurnal Ilmu Perilaku, 10(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.25077/jip.10.1.49-66.2026