Pengujian Level Kreativitas Pada Siswa Berdasarkan Skala Kekuatan dan Kebajikan Karakter dan Tes Kreativitas Verbal

  • Zulmi Ramdani Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Bagus Hary Prakoso Puspendik-Balitbang, Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia
  • Silmi Amrullah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) Bandung
  • Lidwina Felisima Tae Universitas Timor Kupang Nusa Tenggara Timur
  • Feri Indra Irawan


Creativity is an important aspect in building a good culture of education. Good creativity is shown by the learning outcomes that not only focus on improving cognitive abilities but also on the process of solving a problem either by using divergent or convergent thinking skills. This study was carried out with descriptive quantitative. The study was conducted using two instruments, namely the creativity character scale consisting of 10 items and a set of Verbal Creativity Tests (TKV) consisting of six subtests. The total subjects involved in this study were 470 students who were divided into groups that got the character scale of creativity with the group given the verbal ability test. The results of the study, either through the creativity character scale or verbal creativity tests, show the acquisition of creativity scores which describes that there are still many individuals who have not been optimized in terms of creativity. This becomes a serious concern that can be anticipated by providing information about the importance of creativity. It is also built by creating an instrument that is more effective directly capturing the condition of one's creativity as a whole.


Download data is not yet available.


Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2017). After six decades of systematic study of creativity: What do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured? Roeper Review, 39(1), 9–23.

An, D., Song, Y., & Carr, M. (2016). A comparison of two models of creativity: Divergent thinking and creative expert performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 78–84.

Boysen, M. S. W. (2017). Embracing the network: A study of distributed creativity in a school setting. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 102–112.

Burns, B. D., Zhang, Y., Wieth, M., & Touyz, S. (2017). An exploratory study of creativity and eating disorders. Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(1), 536–556.

Cecil, R., & Ph, D. (1981). Test Bias : in God We Trust ; The Journal of Special Education, 17(3).

Chang, S. H., Wang, C. L., & Lee, J. C. (2016). Do award-winning experiences benefit students’ creative self-efficacy and creativity? The moderated mediation effects of perceived school support for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 291–298.

Chang, Y. S., Lin, H. C., Chien, Y. H., & Yen, W. H. (2018). Effects of creative components and creative behavior on design creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 23–31.

De Manzano, Ö., & Ullén, F. (2018). Genetic and environmental influences on the phenotypic associations between intelligence, personality, and creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Intelligence, 69(February), 123–133.

Delis, D. C., Lansing, A., Houston, W. S., Wetter, S., Han, S. D., Jacobson, M., … Kramer, J. (2007). Creativity lost: The importance of testing higher-level executive functions in school-age children and adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25(1), 29–40.

Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Hutterer, L., Steiner, E., Benedek, M., Weber, B., … Weiss, E. M. (2014). Gray matter density in relation to different facets of verbal creativity. Brain Structure and Function, 219(4), 1263–1269.

Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2006). EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: Differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(1), 46–53.

Gajda, A. (2016). The relationship and moderators of school achievement and creativity at different educational stages. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 246–259.

Georgiev, G. V., & Georgiev, D. D. (2018). Enhancing user creativity: Semantic measures for idea generation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 151, 1–15.

Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). Educating which creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 25–32.

Heng, Y. T., Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., & Guarana, C. L. (2018). Archival research: Expanding the methodological toolkit in social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78(August 2017), 14–22.

Hromcová, J., & Agnese, P. (2018). Globalization, welfare, and the attitudes toward higher education. Economic Modelling, (November 2017), 1–15.

Hur, Y. M., Jeong, H. U., & Piffer, D. (2014). Shared genetic and environmental influences on self-reported creative achievement in art and science. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 18–22.

Japardi, K., Bookheimer, S., Knudsen, K., Ghahremani, D. G., & Bilder, R. M. (2018). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of divergent and convergent thinking in Big-C creativity. Neuropsychologia.

Kenett, Y. N. (2019). What can quantitative measures of semantic distance tell us about creativity? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 11–16.

Konstantinidou, E., Zisi, V., Katsarou, D., & Michalopoulou, M. (2015). Barriers and inhibitors of creativity in physical education. European Psychomotricity Journal, 7, 17–31. Retrieved from

LPSP3 UI. (2011). Buku petunjuk penggunaan tes kreativitas verbal. Depok: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.

Lucas, B. (2016). A five-dimensional model of creativity and its assessment in schools. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 278–290.

Ma, X., Yang, Y., Wang, X., & Zang, Y. (2018). An integrative review: Developing and measuring creativity in nursing. Nurse Education Today (Vol. 62). Elsevier Ltd.

Marques-Costa, C., Almiro, P. A., & Simões, M. R. (2018). Computerized cognitive tests (CCT) in elderly: A psychometric review. Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 68(2), 61–68.

Munandar, S., Achir, Y., Winata, S., Suharso, P., Salim, R., Rifameutia, T., & Brahma, G. (1985). Laporan penelitian standarisasi tes kreativitas verbal. Jakarta.

Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1997). Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications. Statistics.

Ramdani, Z. (2018a). Construction of academic integrity scale. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 7(1), 87–97.

Ramdani, Z. (2018b). Kolaborasi antara kepala sekolah, guru dan siswa dalam menciptakan sistem pendidikan yang berkualitas. In National Conference on Educational Assessment and Plolicy. Jakarta: Balai Pusat Penelitian (Balitbang) Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Ramdani, Z., & Fahmi, I. (2014). Profil kekuatan karakter dan kebajikan pada mahasiswa berprestasi. Psympathic, 1, 98–108.

Revilla, E., & Rodríguez-Prado, B. (2018). Bulding ambidexterity through creativity mechanisms: Contextual drivers of innovation success. Research Policy, (January 2017), 0–1.

Runco, M. A. (2018). Creativity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(4), 55–60.

Spies, R., & Plake, B. (2005). The sixteenth mental measurement yearbook. Nebraska: The University of Nebraska Press.

Tarnoto, N., & Purnamasari, A. (2009). Perbedaan kreativitas siswa SMPN 2 Moyudan ditinjau dari tingkat pendidikan ibu. Humanitas.

Tian, F., Chen, Q., Zhu, W., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Zhu, X., … Qiu, J. (2018). The association between visual creativity and cortical thickness in healthy adults. Neuroscience Letters, 683, 104–110.

Zabelina, D. L., & Ganis, G. (2018). Creativity and cognitive control: Behavioral and ERP evidence that divergent thinking, but not real-life creative achievement, relates to better cognitive control. Neuropsychologia.

Zhou, J., Shen, J., Wang, X., Neber, H., & Johji, I. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison: Teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 239–247.
How to Cite
RAMDANI, Zulmi et al. Pengujian Level Kreativitas Pada Siswa Berdasarkan Skala Kekuatan dan Kebajikan Karakter dan Tes Kreativitas Verbal. Jurnal Ilmu Perilaku, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 107-117, jan. 2019. ISSN 2581-0421. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 16 jan. 2019. doi: