Konstruksi Skala Kepedulian terhadap Penggunaan Energi

  • Rizal Kurniawan Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Saifuddin Azwar

Abstract

Using electricity and fuel oil might have some negative impact towards the national economy and the environment. Psychological scale for measuring awareness of energy usage has never been tested before. The main purpose of this study is to construct psychological scale for measuring energy usage. The concept of Amburgey (2012) has been used to describe of psychological concern that are perceived threat and desired change. Perceived threat is an evaluation of a person to a problem and desired change is one’s willingness to resolve that problem. Four hundred-thirty eight students were enrolled in this study with a mean of age 21 years old. The results of content item validation show that one item from perceived threat’s subscale has value of Aiken (V) less than .50 and all of items from desired change’s subscale have V value greater than .50. Result from item’s discrimination process show that 40% items from perceived threat’s subscale has low of discrimination power and desired change’s sub scale has 31%. Alpha value for perceived threat’s subscales is .76 and desired change’s sub scale is .78. The concern for energy usage scale has poor model fit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amburgey, J. W. (2012). Toward a new conceptualization of environmental concern: Perception of threat and motivation for change as underlying psychological dimensions. Utah: University of Utah.

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar.

BPS, (2010). Penduduk Indonesia menurut Provinsi 1971, 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000 dan 2010. Diunduh dari www.bps.go.id, diakses pada tanggal 15 November, 2013.

Cook, C. E., Cleland, J., Pietrobon, R., Garrow, A. P., & Macfarlane, G. J. (2007). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the disability associated with foot pain: An application of item response theory to the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index. Physiotherapy, 93: 89-95.

Dunlap, R. E. (2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldview use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1).

Dunlap, R.E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: conceptual and measurement issues. Dalam R. E Dunlap & W. Michelson, Handbook of environmental sociology. Wesport: Greenwood.

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G. & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.

Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2008). Psychometrics an introduction. Los angeles: Sage.

Hasla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & Garling, T. (2008). The relationship between awareness of consequences, environmental concern and value orientation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28: 1-9.

Hawcroft, L. C., & Milfont, T. L. (2010). The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30: 143-158.

Huijts, N.M.A., DeGroot, J. I. M., Molin, E.J.E., & VanWee, B. (2013). Intention to act toward a local hydrogen refueling facility: moral consideration versus self-interest. Transportation Research Part A, 48: 63-74.

Jacovcevic, A., & Steg, L. (2013). Sustainable transportation in Argentina: Values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F, 20: 70-79.

Karpiak, C. P., & Baril, G.l. (2008). Moral reasoning and concern for the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28: 203-208.
Kementrian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2011). Efisiensi dan konservasi energi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat jenderal energi terbarukan dan konservasi energi kementrian energi dan sumber daya mineral Indonesia.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equational modeling, 2nd edition. London: The Guilford Press.

Osumanu, I. K. (2007). Environmental concern of poor households in low income cities: The case of the Tamala Metropolis, Ghana. Geo Jurnal: 68:343-355.

Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q. M. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Leito, N.C. (2013). Economic Growth, energy consumtion, financial development, international trade and CO2 emmision in Indonesia. Reneweble and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25: 109-121.

Singhirunnusorn, W., Luesopa, P., Pansee, J., & Sahachaisaeree, N. (2012). Student’s behavior toward energy conservation and models of transportation: A case study in Mahasarakham university. Social and Behavioral Science, 35: 764-771.

Singh, R., & Setiawan, A. D. (2013). Biomass energy policies and strategies: Harvesting potential in India and Indonesia. Renewable an Sustainbility Energy Reviews, 22: 322-345.

Snelgar, R. S. (2006). Egoistic, altruistic and biospheric environmental concern: Measurement and structure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26: 87-99.

Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factor influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25: 415-425.

Takeuchi, M., Miyaoka, H., Tomada, A., Suzuki, M., Lu, X., & Kitamura, T. (2011). Validity and reliability of Japanese version of the temperament and character inventory: A study of university and college students. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 52: 109-117.

Urban, J., & Scasny. (2012). Exploring domestic energy saving: The role of environmental concern and backround variables. Energy Policy, 47: 69-80.

Van Birgelen, M., Semeijn, J., & Behren, P. (2011). Explaining pro environmental consumer behavior in travel. Journal of Air Transportation Management, 17: 125-128.

Wijaya K. (2010). Prospek bioetanol di Indonesia. Dalam Jusmina,. Wijaya, K., & Budiman, A, Dari Yogyakarta untuk energi Indonesia: Pandangan dan hasil riset pakar Universitas Gadjah Mada di bidang energi. Yogyakarta: Pusat study energy UGM.

Yen, N. S., Shakur, E. S. A., & Wai, C. W. (2010). Energy conservation opportunities in Malaysian Universities. Malaysian Journal of Real Estate.

Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhou, G. (2013a). Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organization: An empirical study based on norm activation model. Energy Policy, 62: 1120-1127.

Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhou, G. (2013b). Determinant of employee electricity saving: The role of social benefits, personal benefits and organizational electricity climate. Journal of Cleaner Production, S0959-6526(13)00697-5.
Published
2017-08-01
How to Cite
KURNIAWAN, Rizal; AZWAR, Saifuddin. Konstruksi Skala Kepedulian terhadap Penggunaan Energi. Jurnal Ilmu Perilaku, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 22-32, aug. 2017. ISSN 2581-0421. Available at: <http://jip.fk.unand.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/22>. Date accessed: 21 nov. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.25077/jip.1.1.22-32.2017.