Peran Kepercayaan Sosial dan Sentralitas Jaringan Terhadap Persepsi Resiko Bencana Alam

  • Sapta Widi Wusana Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Rahmat Hidayat Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada

Abstract

This research is aimed to understand the risk perception of Merapi disaster in hazardous community, by viewing the contribution of social network centrality and social trust towards risk perception of natural disaster. Hypotheses in this research are; social network centrality (degree, closeness, betweenness, eigenvector centrality) and social trust which all together are able to predict Merapi’s disaster risk perception. This research was conducted at Dusun Gondoarum, Desa Wonokerto, Kecamatan Turi, Kabupaten Sleman, DIY, with 83 total respondents, research data revealed by psychological scale and name generator. Result of this research prove that social trust, centrality degree, centrality betweeness, centrality closeness, and centrality eigenvector all together are able to predict merapi’s disaster risk perception, with 30.9 % coefficient determination value (R2). Which mean that the research hypothesis is convicted. Two predictor which gave a big role towards natural disaster risk perception are social trust and eigenvector centrality with coefficient determination at 23.6%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bakir, V. (2006). Policy Agenda Setting and Risk Communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics Summer, 11(3), 67-88.

Bateman, I.J., Georgiou, S., Day, R.J., & Langford, I.H. (2000). A cognitive social psychological model for predicting individual risk perceptions and preferences.

Cserge Working Paper. Diunduh dari http://www.cserge.ac.uk/sites/default/files/gec_2000_09.pdf.

Borgatti, S.P. (2005). Centrality and Network Flow. Social Network, 27, 55-71.

Borgatti, S.P & Foster, P.C. (2003). The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–101.

Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. & Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Analytic Technologies.

Burt, R.S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287–1335.

Carlino, S., Somma, R., & Mayberry, G.C. (2008). Volcanic risk perception of young people in the urban areas of Vesuvius: Comparisons with other volcanic areas and implications for emergency management. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 172: 229–243.

Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2004). Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4): 311-327.

Field, J. (2005). Modal Sosial. Medan: Bina Media Perintis.

Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in Social Network, Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.

Friedkin, N.E. (1991). Theoritical Foundation for Centrality Measures. AJS, 96(6), 1478-1504.

Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.

Gulliver, P & Begg, D. (2007). Personality factors as predictors of persistent risky driving behavior and crash involvement among young adults. Inj Prev, 13(6), 376–381.

Jatman, D. 2000. Psikologi Jawa. Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya.

Kuz, A & Giandini, R. (2012). Social Network Analysis: a practical measurement and evaluation of Trust in a classroom environment. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 269-283.

Luo, J.D. (2005). Particularistic Trust and General Trust: A Network Analysis in Chinese Organizations. Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 437–458.

McCarty, C., Eric, C. J., Albert, J.F, Arthur, D. M., Graham, A T., & Linda, M.W. (2013). Cross-Cultural and Site-Based Influences on Demographic, Well-being, and Social Network Predictors of Risk Perception in Hazard and Disaster Settings in Ecuador and Mexico. Human Nature, 24, 5–32.

Mutter, B. A. (2009). Risk Perception, Social Networks, And Media Frames Associated With Human-Cormorant Interactions In The Great Lakes, (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Michigan State University.

Paton, D. (2007). Preparing for natural hazards: the role of community trust. Disaster Prevention and Management, 16(3), 370-379.

Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Lorenzoni, I. (2005). Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power, Climate Change and Energy Options in Britain. Understanding Risk Working Paper, 06-02. Diunduh dari http://psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/survey_2005.pdf..

Reed, M., Prell, C., & Hubacek, K. (2009). Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Society and Natural Resources, 22, 501–518.

Rothstein, B & Eek, D. (2006). Political Corruption and Social Trust. Rationality & Society, 21(1), 81-112.

Rundmo, T ., Moen, B.E. & Sjöberg, L. (2004). Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Norwegian University of Science and Technology: Department of Psychology.

Siegrist, M. & Cvetkovich, S. (2000). Perception if hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20(7), 713-719.

Susetyo,B. D. P., Widiyatmadi, H. M. E. & Sudiantara, Y. (2014). Konsep Self Dan Penghayatan Self Orang Jawa. Psikodimensia, 13(1), 47 – 59.

Sjöberg, L. (1999). Risk Perception in Western Europe. Ambio, 28(6), 543-549.

Sjöberg, L. (2003). Risk perception is not what it seems: The psychometric paradigm revisited. Valdor, Values in Decisions on Risk, 35 (4), 14-29.

Sjoberg, L. (2007). Emotions and Risk Perception. Risk Management, 9(4), 223-237.

Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In S. Krimsky and D. Golding (Eds.). Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Slovic, P., McDaniels, T., & Axelrod, L.J. (1999). Perceptions of ecological risk from natural hazards. Journal of Risk Research, 2(1), 31–53.

Stead, M.S., Polunin, N.V.V., & Turner, R. (2014). Social networks and fishers’ behavior: exploring the links between information flow and fishing success in the Northumberland lobster fishery. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 38-49.

Triyoga, L. S. (2010). Merapi dan Orang Jawa: Persepsi dan Kepercayaannya. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Valente, T.W. & Costenbader, E. (2003). The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Social Networks, 25, 283–307.

Wasserman, S.S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wogalter, M.S., DeJoy, D.M., & Laughery, K.R., (1999). Warnings and Risk Communication. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.

Yamagishi, M & Yamagishi, T. (1994). Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129-167.

Yamagishi, T. (1989). Major Theoritical Approach in Social Dilemmas Research. Japan Psychological Review (Cook, K.S, Trans.), 32(3), 262-294.
Published
2017-09-04
How to Cite
WUSANA, Sapta Widi; HIDAYAT, Rahmat. Peran Kepercayaan Sosial dan Sentralitas Jaringan Terhadap Persepsi Resiko Bencana Alam. Jurnal Ilmu Perilaku, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-10, sep. 2017. ISSN 2581-0421. Available at: <http://jip.fk.unand.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/15>. Date accessed: 21 nov. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.25077/jip.1.1.1-10.2017.